-
-
$
Product Category: Projects
Product Code: 00005414
No of Pages: 118
No of Chapters: 4
File Format: Microsoft Word
Price :
$20
ABSTRACT
Preservation
of fish by drying over different types of heat regimes have been known.
However, there has not been a comprehensive comparison in terms of the possible
contamination associated with these drying regimes. This work was set to
evaluate the levels of PAHs that are likely to accumulate in the bodies of
fresh water fishes dried under heat from charcoal, sun (sun drying), electric
oven and polythene augmented drying regimes (burning of used cellophone
materials). The levels of sixteen PAHs were determined in fish samples
harvested from Otuocha River in Anambra State, Nigeria. The fish samples were
dried, pulverized and subjected to soxhlet extraction using n-hexane at 600c
for 8hrs. The water content of the eluants were further removed with florisil
clean-up before Gas chromatographic – mass spectrometric analysis. Results
obtained showed that sun-dried fish had PAHs concentration to be 35.7+
0.2µg/g; oven dried gave 47.7+ 0.2µg/g and charcoal
dried 79.53+ 0.2µg/g, while drying with firewood resulted in 188.1+
0.2µg/g. Charcoal drying augmented with polythene resulted into PAHs level of
166.2+ 0.1µg/g while fish dried under heat generated from burning
firewood and polythene material resulted into PAHs concentration of 696.3+0.2µg/g.
Preliminary analysis of the fresh water samples and the undried fish samples
(control) revealed that the fresh water contained total PAHs level of 2.86+
0.1µg/ml, while the fresh fish 4.97+ 0.2µg/g. The concentration of PAHs
in all the dried fish under different drying agents were significantly higher
than the control. The result is more worrisome in that even the fishes dried
under the sun have PAHs significantly higher than that of the control
(p<0.05). It is apparent that the increase in PAHs must have come from the
environmental PAHs (exposure) under which the fishes were dried (under sun).
For the other drying regimes, in which the levels of PAHs were significantly
higher than that of sun-dried, it can be concluded that the excessive PAHs in
the body of the dried fish were from the “burning” or drying agents. More
significantly are the observed very high increase in PAHs when drying was
augmented with polythene, an agent known to be a high source of PAHs when
incinerated. Consumers of dried fish should therefore beware of the dried fish
they purchase from the local market
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Title Page |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
i |
|
Certification - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ii |
|
Acknowledgment- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
iii |
|
|
Abstract - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
iv |
|
Table of Content - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
v |
|
|
List of Figures - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
vi |
|
|
List of Tables - - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
vii |
|
|
|
List of Abbreviations |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
viii |
|
|
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
1.1. |
Introduction |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
|
|
1.2. |
Physical and
Chemical Characteristics of PAHs |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
||||||
|
1.3. |
Sources and
Emission of PAHs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
||||
|
1.3.1. |
Stationary
Sources - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
||
|
1.3.1.1. |
Domestic
Sources |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
||
|
1.3.1.2. |
Industrial
Sources |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
||
|
1.3.2. |
Mobile Sources |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
||
|
1.3.3. |
Agricultural
Sources |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
||
|
1.3.4. |
Natural Sources |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
||
|
1.3.5 |
Uses of PAHs- - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
|
||
|
1.4. |
Routes of Exposure
for PAHs - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
||||
|
1.4.1 |
Air - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
|
1.4.2 |
Water |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
|
1.4.3 |
Soil |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
|
1.4.4. |
Foodstuffs - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
|
|
1.4.5. |
Other Sources
of Exposure |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
|||
|
1.5. |
Individuals at
Risk of Exposure - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
||||
|
1.6. |
Standards and
Regulation for PAH Exposure - |
- |
- |
12 |
|
||||||
|
1.7. |
Metabolism of
PAHs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
||
|
1.7.1. |
Fate of PAHs in
Soil and Groundwater Environment - |
- |
20 |
|
|||||||
|
1.7.2. |
Fate of PAHs in
Air and their Ecotoxicological consequences |
- |
21 |
||||||||
|
1.8 |
Human Health Effects |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
||
|
1.8.1 |
Acute or
Short-Term Health Effects |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
||||
|
1.8.2. |
Chronic or
Long-Term Health Effects - |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
|
|||||
|
1.8.3 |
Carcinogenicity |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
||
|
1.8.4. |
Teratogenicity |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24 |
|
|
1.8.5. |
Genotoxicity |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
|
|
1.8.6. |
Immunotoxicity |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
||
|
1.8.7. |
effect of PAHs
Pathogenic Change |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
||||
|
1.9. |
Fish |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
28 |
|
1.9.1. |
Food Smoking - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
29 |
|
||
|
1.10. |
Rationale of
Study |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30 |
||
|
1.11. |
Aims and
Objectives |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30 |
||
|
CHAPTER TWO:
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2.0 |
Material and
methods |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32 |
|||
|
2.1. |
Materials |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32 |
|
|
2.1.1. |
Apparatus and
Equipment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32 |
|||
|
2.1.2. |
Chemicals |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32 |
|
2.1.3. |
Fish Samples |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
33 |
|
2.1.4. |
Study Site |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
33 |
|
2.2. |
Methods |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
35 |
|
2.2.1. |
Collection of
Fish Samples and Drying |
- |
- |
- |
- |
35 |
||||
|
2.2.2. |
Sample
Preparation for the Analysis of Dried Fishes - |
- |
- |
36 |
||||||
|
2.2.3. |
Preparation of
Florisil for clean-up |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
37 |
|||
|
2.2.4. |
Instrument
Analysis |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
38 |
|
|
CHAPTER
THREE: RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
41 |
|
CHAPTER
FOUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0. |
Discussion |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
80 |
|
|
Conclusion |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
84 |
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Table 1: |
Physical and
Chemical Properties of PAHs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
|
Table 2: |
levels of PAHs Exposures from Workplace - - |
- |
- |
13 |
|
|
|
Table3: |
Carcinogenic
Classification of Selected PAHs |
|
- |
- |
- |
19 |
|
Table4: |
Temperature
Condition of GC-MS |
- |
- |
- |
- |
39 |
|
Table 5: |
Weight of Fish
used in October, November and January 2014 |
- |
41 |
|||
|
Table 6: |
GC-MS result of
fish samples in October 2013 |
- |
- |
- |
43 |
|
Table 7: | GC-MS result of
fish samples in November 2013 | - | - | - | 44 |
Table 8: | GC-MS result of
fish samples in January 201 - | - | - | 45 |
|
Table 9: | Statistical
mean value of GC-Ms result of the three months |
| - | - | |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF FIGURES
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Figure 1: |
Mechanism of
Activation of BaP by Cytochrome P450 and |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Epoxide
Hydroxilase - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
|
Figure 2: |
Aryl
hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) pathway activated by BaP - |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Figure 3: |
Bay region of
some PAHs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
27 |
|
Figure 4: |
Map Showing
Otuocha River in Anambra State |
- |
- |
- |
34 |
|||
|
Figure 5: |
Monthly
distribution of Acenaphthylene in various treatments - |
- |
49 |
|||||
|
Figure 6: |
Monthly
distribution of Anthracene in various treatments |
- |
- |
51 |
||||
|
Figure 7: |
Monthly
distribution of 1,2 Benzanthracene in various treatments - |
53 |
||||||
|
Figure 8: |
Monthly
distribution of Benzo(pyrene) in various treatments |
- |
55 |
|
|
Figure 9: |
Monthly
distribution of Benzo(fluoranthene) in various treatments |
|
||
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 10: |
Monthly
distribution of Benzo(g,h,i)perylene in various treatments |
|
||
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 11: |
Monthly
distribution of Benzo(k)fluoranthene in various treatments |
61 |
||
|
Figure 12: |
Monthly
distribution of chrysene in various treatments |
- |
- |
63 |
|
Figure 13: |
Monthly
distribution of Dibenz(a,h)anthracene in various treatments |
65 |
||
|
Figure 14: |
Monthly
distribution of fluoranthene in various treatments |
|
- |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 15: |
Monthly distribution
of fluorene in various treatments |
- |
- |
69 |
|
Figure 16: |
Monthly
distribution of indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene in various treatments |
71 |
||
|
Figure 17: |
Monthly
distribution of Naphthalene in various treatments - |
- |
73 |
|
|
Figure18: |
Monthly
distribution of Pyrene in various treatments |
- |
- |
74 |
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
PAHs – Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
LMW – Low Molecular Weight
HMW – High Molecular Weight
ATSDR – Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
EPA – Environmental
Protection Agency
POP - Persistent Organic
Pollutants
WHO - World Health
Organization
MCL - Maximum Contaminant
PPB - Parts Per Billion
IARC – International Agency
for Research on Cancer
OSHA – Occupational Safety
and Health Administration
Ctpv – Coal Tar Pitch Volatiles
PEL – Permissible Exposure
Limit
NIOSH – National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
TLV- Threshold Limit Value
TWA – Time Weighted Average
REL – Recommended Exposure
Limit
FAO – Food and Agricultural
Organization
FDA Food and Drug Administration
BAP – Benzo (a) Pyrene
CDC – Center for Disease
Control and Prevention
BEI – Biological Exposure Index
DNA – Deoxynbonucleic Acid
SPSS – Statistical Product
and Solution Services
ANOVA – One Way Analysis of
Variance
GC-MS – Gas Chromatography
Mass Spectrometer
F/P – Ratio Flouranthene to
Pyrene
KOW – Octanol-Water
Partition Coefficients
KOC – Partition Coefficient
for Organic Carbon
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of organic compounds consisting of two or more fused benzene rings (linear, cluster or angular arrangement), or compounds made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms grouped into rings containing five or six carbon atoms. They are called “PAH derivatives” when an alkyl or other radical is introduced to the ring, and heterocyclic aromatic compounds (HACs) when one carbon atom in a ring is replaced by a nitrogen, oxygen or sulphur atoms. PAHs originate mainly from anthropogenic processes particularly from incomplete combustion of organic fuels. PAHs are distributed widely in the atmosphere. Natural processes, such as volcanic eruptions and forest fires, also contribute to an ambient existence of PAHs (Suchanova et al., 2008). PAHs can be present in both particulate and gaseous phases, depending on their volatility. Low molecular weight PAHs (LMW PAHs) that have two or three aromatic rings (molecular weight from 152 to 178g/mol) are emitted in the gaseous phase, while high molecular weight PAHs (HMW PAHs), molecular weight ranging from 228 to 278g/mol, with five or more rings, are emitted in the particulate phase, (ATSDR, 1995) . In the atmosphere, PAHs can undergo photo-degradation and react with other pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ozone. Due to widespread sources and persistent characteristics, PAHs disperse through atmospheric transport and exist almost everywhere. There are hundreds of PAH compounds in the environment but in practice PAH analysis is restricted to the determination of six (6) to sixteen (16) compounds. Human beings are exposed to PAH mixtures in gaseous or particulate phases in ambient air. Long term exposure to high concentration of PAHs is associated with adverse health problems. Since some PAHs are considered carcinogens, inhalation of PAHs in particulates is a potentially serious health risk linked to lung cancer (Philips, 1999).
1.2. Physical and
Chemical Characteristics of PAHs.
PAHs
are a group of several hundred individual organic compounds which contain two
or more aromatic rings and generally occur as complex mixtures rather than
single compounds. PAHs are classified by their melting and boiling points,
vapour pressure, and water solubility, depending on their structure. Pure PAHs
are usually coloured, crystalline solids at ambient temperature. The physical
properties of PAHs vary with their molecular weight and structure (Table1).
Except for naphthalene, they have very low to low water solubilities, and low
to moderately high vapour pressures. Their octanol-water partition coefficients
(Kow) are relatively high, indicating a relatively high potential for
adsorption to suspended particles in the air and in water, and for
bioconcentration in organisms (Sloof et
al., 1989). Table 1 shows physical and chemical characteristics of few
selected PAHs from the sixteen (16) priority PAHs, listed by the US EPA. (see
appendix). Most PAHs, especially as molecular weight increases, are soluble in
non-polar organic solvents and are barely soluble in water (ATSDR, 1995).
Most
PAHs are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the environment. Many of them
are chemically inert. However, PAHs can be photochemically decomposed under
strong ultraviolet light or sunlight, and thus some PAHs can be lost during
atmospheric sampling. Also, PAHs can react with ozone, hydroxyl radicals,
nitrogen and sulfur oxides, and nitric and sulfuric acids which affect the
environmental fate or conditions of PAHs (Dennis et al., 1984; Simko, 1991).
PAHs possess very characteristic UV absorbance spectra. Each ring structure has a unique UV spectrum, thus each isomer has a different UV absorbance spectrum. This is especially useful in the identification of PAHs. Most PAHs are also fluorescent, emitting characteristic wavelengths of light when they are excited (when the molecules absorb light). Generally, PAHs only weakly absorb light of infrared wavelengths between 7 and 14µm, the wavelength usually absorbed by chemical involved in global warning (Ramanathan, 1985).
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are present in the environment as complex mixtures that are difficult to characterize and measure. They are generally analyzed using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or by using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) and fluorescence dectetors (Slooff et al., 1989)
Source and Emission of PAHs
PAHs
are mainly derived from anthropogenic activities related to pyrolysis and
incomplete combustion of organic matter. Sources of PAHs affect their
characterization and distribution, as well as their toxicity. Major sources of
PAH emissions may be divided into four classes: stationary sources (including
domestic and industrial sources), mobile emission, agriculture activities, and
natural sources (Wania et al, 1996).
1.3. Stationary
Sources
Some
PAHs are emitted from point sources and this is hardly shifted (moved) for a
long period of time. Stationary sources are further subdivided into two main
sources: domestic and industrial.
1.3.1. Domestic
Sources
Heating
and cooking are dominant domestic sources of PAHs. The burning and pyrolysis of
coal, oil, gas, garbage, wood, or other substances are the main domestic
sources. Domestic sources are important contributors to the total PAHs emitted
into the environment. Difference in climate patterns and domestic heating
systems produce large geographic variations in domestic emission. PAH emissions
from these sources may be a major health concern because of their prevalence in
indoor environments (Ravindra et al.,
2008). According to a recent World Health Organization (WHO) report, more than
75% of people in China, India, and South East Asia and 50-75% of people in
parts of South America and Africa use combustion of solid fuel, such as wood,
charcoal for daily cooking.
Main indoor PAH sources are cooking and heating and infiltration from outdoors. PAH emissions from cooking account for 32.8% of total indoor PAHs (Zhu et al., 2009). LMW PAHs which originate from indoor sources are the predominant proportion of the total PAHs identified in residential non-smoking air. Toxicity of PAH mixtures from indoor sources is lower than mixtures which contain large amounts of high molecular weight PAHs. Cigarette smoke is also a dominant sources of PAHs in indoor environments. In many studies, PAHs in the indoor air of smoking residences tend to be higher than those of non-smoking residences.
1.3.2. Industrial
Sources
Sources
of PAHs include emission from industrial activities, such as primary aluminum
and coke production, petrochemical industries, rubber tire and cement
manufacturing, bitumen and asphalt industries, wood preservation, commercial
heat and power generation, and waste incineration (Fabbri and Vassura , 2006).
1.3.3. Mobile
Sources
Mobile sources are major causes of PAHs emissions in urban areas. PAHs are mainly emitted from exhaust fumes of vehicles, including automobile, railways, ships, aircrafts, and other motor vehicles. PAHs emissions from mobile sources are associated with use of diesel, coal, gasoline, oils, and lubricant oil. Exhaust emissions of PAHs from motor vehicles are formed by three mechanisms: (1) synthesis from smaller molecules and aromatic compounds in fuel; (2) storage in engine deposits and in fuel; (3) pyrolysis of lubricants (Baek et al., 1991). One of the major influences on the production of PAHs from gasoline automobiles is the air-to-fuel ratio. It has been reported that the amount of PAHs in engine exhaust decreases with leaner mixtures (Ravindra et al., 2006b). A main contribution to PAH concentrations in road dust as well as urban areas is vehicle exhaust. Abrantes et al., (2009) reported that the total emissions and toxicities of PAHs released from light-duty vehicles using ethanol fuels are less than those using gasohol. Low molecular weight PAHs are the dominant PAHs emitted from light duty vehicles and helicopter engines.
1.3.4
Agricultural Sources
Open burning of bush wood, straw, moorland heather, and stubble are agricultural sources of PAHs. All of those activities involve burning organic materials under suboptimum combustion conditions. Thus it is expected that a significant amount of PAHs are produced from the open burning of biomass. PAH concentrations released from wood combustion depend on wood type, kiln type, and combustion temperature. Between 80 – 90% of PAHs emitted from biomass burning are low molecular weight PAHs, including naphthalene acenaphthylene, phenanthene, fluoranthene and pyrene. Lu et al., (2009) reported that PAHs emitted from the open burning of rice and bean straw are influenced by combustion parameters. Total emissions of 16 PAHs from the burning of rice and bean straw varied from 9.29 to 23.6µg/g and from 3.13 to 49.9µg/g respectively. PAH emissions increased with increasing temperature from 200 to 7000c.
Maximum emissions
of PAHs were
observed at 40% O2
content in supplied
air. However,
emission
of PAHs released from the open burning of rice straw negatively correlate with
the moisture content in the straw (Lu et
al., 2009).
1.3.5. Natural
Sources
Accidental burning of forests, woodland, and moorland due to lightning strikes are natural sources of PAHs. Furthermore, volcanic eruptions and decaying organic matter are also important natural sources, contributing to the levels of PAHs in the atmosphere. The degree of PAH production depends on meteorological conditions such as wind, temperature, humidity, and fuel characteristics and type; such as moisture content, green wood, and seasonal wood (Wild and Jones, 1995).
1.3.6 Uses of
PAHs
PAHs
are not synthesized chemically for industrial purposes. Rather than industrial
sources, the major source of PAH is the incomplete combustion of organic
material such as coal, oil, and wood. However, there are a few commercial uses
for many PAHs. They are mostly used as intermediaries in pharmaceuticals,
agricultural products, photographic products, thermosetting plastics,
lubricating materials, and other chemical industries. Acenaphthene, Anthracene,
Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Phenanthrene and Pyrene are used in the manufacture of
dyes, plastics, pigments, pharmaceutical and agrochemicals such as pesticides,
wood preservatives resins and so on.
Other PAHs may be contained in asphalt used for the
construction of roads, as well as roofing tar. Precise PAHs, specific refined
products, are used also in the field of electronics, functional plastics, and
liquid crystals. (Katarina, 2011).
1.4 Routes of Exposure for PAHs
PAH exposure through air, water, soil, and food sources occurs on a regular basis. The routes of exposure include ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact in both occupational and non-occupational settings. Some exposure may involve more than one route simultaneously, affecting the total absorbed dose (such as dermal and inhalation exposure from contaminated air). All non-workplace source of exposure such as diet, smoking, and burning of coal and wood should be taken into consideration (ATSDR, 1995).
1.4.1 Air
PAHs concentrations in air can vary from less than 5 to
200,000 (ng/m3) (Cherng et al., 1996; Georgiadis and Kyrtopoulos, 1999). Although
environmental air levels are lower than those associated with specific
occupational exposure, they are of public health concern when spread over large
urban populations (Zmirou et al.,
2000).
The background levels of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s toxicological priority for PAHs in ambient air have been reported to be 0.02 – 1.2 ng/m3 in rural areas and 0.15 – 19.3 ng/m3 in urban areas (ATSDR, 1995).
Cigarette smoking and environmental tobacco are other
sources of air exposure. Smoking one cigarette can yield an intake of 20-40ng
of benzo (a) pyrene (Philips, 1996; O’Neill et
al., 1997). Smoking one pack of unfiltered cigarette per day yields
0.7µg/day benzo (a) pyrene exposure. Smoking a pack of filtered cigarette per
day yields 0.4 µg/day (Sullivan and Krieger 2001).
Environmental tobacco smoke contains a variety of PAHs, such
as benzo (a) pyrene, and more than 40 known or suspected human carcinogens.
Side-stream smoke (smoke emitted from a burning cigarette between puffs)
contains PAHs and other cytotoxic substances in quantities much higher than
those found in mainstream smoke (exhaled smoke of smoker) (Jinot and Bayard,
1996; Nelson, 2001).
1.4.2. Water
PAHs can leach from soil into ground water. Water contamination also occurs from industrial effluents and accidental spills during oil shipment at sea. Concentrations of benzo (a) pyrene in drinking water are generally lower than those in untreated water and about 100 fold lower than the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) drinking water standard. (EPA’s maximum contaminant level (MCL) for benzo (a) pyrene in drinking water is 0.2 parts per billion {ppb}(US EPA, 1995).
1.4.3 Soil
Soil contains measurable amounts of PAHs primarily from
airborne fallout. Documented level of PAHs in soil near oil refineries have
been as high as 200,000 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) of dried soil. Levels
in soil samples obtained near cities and areas with heavy traffic were
typically less than 2,000 µg/kg (IARC, 1973).
1.4.4 Food Stuffs
In non-occupational settings, up to 70% of PAH exposure for
non-smoking person can be associated with diet (Skupinska et al., 2004). PAH concentrations in foodstuffs vary. Charring meat
or barbecuing food over a charcoal, wood, or other type of fire greatly increase
the concentration of PAHs. For example, the PAH level for charring meat can be
as high as 10-20 µg/kg (Philips, 1999). Charbroiled and smoked meats and fish
contain more PAHs than do uncooked products, with up to 2.0 µg/kg of benzo (a)
pyrene detected in smoked fish. Tea, roasted peanuts, coffee, refined vegetable
oil, cereals, spinach, and many other foodstuffs contain PAHs. Some crops such
as wheat, rye and lentils, may synthesize PAHs or absorb them via water, air,
or soil (Grimmer, 1968; Shabad and Cohan 1972; IARC, 1973).
1.4.5 Other Sources of Exposure
PAHs are found in prescription and non-prescription coal tar
products used to treat dermatologic disorders such as psoriasis and dandruff
(Van Schooten, 1996). PAHs and their metabolites are excreted in breastmilk,
and they readily cross the placenta.
Antracene laxative use has been associated with melanosis of
the colon and rectum (Badiali et al., 1985).
1.5 Individuals at Risk of Exposure
Workers in industries or trades using or producing coal or
coal products are at highest risk for PAHs exposure. Those workers include, but
are not limited to Aluminum workers, Asphalt workers, Carbon black workers,
Chimney sweeps, Coal-gas workers, Fishermen (coal tar on nets), Graphite
electrode workers, Machinists, Mechanics (auto and disel engine), Printers,
Road (pavement) workers, Roofers, Steel foundry workers, Tire and rubber
manufacturing workers, and Workers exposed to creosote, such as Carpenters,
Farmers, railroad workers, Tunnel construction workers, and Utility workers
Exposure
is almost always to mixtures that pose a challenge in developing conclusions
(Samet, 1995). Fetuses may be at risk for PAH exposure. PAH and its metabolites
have been shown to cross the placenta in various animal studies (ATSDR, 1995).
Because PAH are excreted in breast milk, nursing infants of exposed mothers can
be easily exposed.
1.6 Standard and
Regulations of PAHs Exposure.
The United States Government Agencies have established
standards that are relevant to PAHs exposure in the workplace and the
environment. There is a standard relating to PAHs in the workplace, and also a
standard for PAHs in drinking water.
Occupational
safety and health administrations (OSHA) have not established a
substance-specific standard for occupational exposure to PAHs. Exposures are
regulated under OSHA’s Air contaminants standard for substances termed coal tar
pitch volatiles (CTPVs) and coke oven emission. Employees exposed to CTPVs in
the coke oven industry are covered by the coke oven emissions standard.
The
OSHA coke oven emission standard required employers to control employee
exposure to coke oven emissions by the use of engineering controls and work
practices.
Whenever
the engineering and work practices control that can be instituted are not
sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the permissible exposure
limit (PEL), the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce exposure to the
lowest level achievable by these controls and shall supplement them by the use of
respiratory protection. The OSHA standards also include elements of medical
surveillance for workers exposed to coke oven emissions (ATSDR, 1995).
Air
The OSHA PEL
for PAHs in the workplace is 0.2miligram/cubic meter (mg/m3).
The OSHA – mandated PAH workroom air standard is an 8-hour time-weighted
average (TWA) permissible
exposure limit (PEL) of 0.2 mg/m3, measured as the benzene-solube
fraction of coal tar pitch
volatiles. The OSHA standard for coke oven emissions is 0.15 mg/m3. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recommended that the workplace exposure limit for PAHs be set at the lowest detectable concentration which was 0.1 mg/m3 for coal tar pitch volatile agents at the time of the recommendation (ATSDR, 1995).
Table 2: Levels of PAHs Exposures
from Workplace
|
Agency |
|
|
Focus |
Level |
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
American conference |
Air
workplace |
0.2 |
mg/m3 |
for |
Advisory: TLV
(8 – |
||||||
|
of |
governmental |
|
benzene –
soluble |
hours TWA) |
|
|
|||||
|
industrial
hygienists |
|
coal tar
pitch fraction |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
National institute
for |
Air:
workplace |
0.1
mg/m3 for coal
tar |
REL
(8 – hour TWA) |
||||||||
|
occupational |
safety |
|
pitch
volatile agents |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
and health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Occupational |
safety |
Air:
workplace |
0.2mg/m3 |
for |
Regulation: |
|
(benzene |
||||
|
and |
|
health |
|
benzene-soluble |
coal |
soluble |
fraction |
of |
|||
|
administration. |
|
|
tar pitch
fraction |
|
coal tar
volatiles) PEL |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 – hour
workday. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. |
environmental |
Water |
0.0001miligrams |
per |
MCL |
for |
benz |
(a) |
|||
|
protection
agency |
|
litre
(mg/l) |
|
anthracene |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
0.0002mg/l |
|
MCL for |
benzo |
(a) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pyrene, |
benzo |
(b) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluoranthene, |
benzo |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) |
fluoranthene, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chrysene. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
0.0003mg/l |
|
MCL
for dibenz (a,h) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
anthracene |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
0.0004mg/l |
|
MCL |
for |
indeno |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,2,3-c,d)
pyrene |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ATSDR, 1995).
•
TLV: threshold limit value.
• TWA
(time – weighted average), concentration for a normal 8-hour workday and a
40-hour workweek to which nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed.
• REL
(recommended exposure limit): recommended airborne exposure limit for coal
pitch volatiles (cyclohexane – extractable fraction) averaged over a 10 – hour
work shift.
• PEL
(permissible exposure limit): the legal airborne permissible exposure limit (PEL)
for coal tar pitch volatiles (Benezene soluble fraction) averaged over an 8 –
hour work shift.
•
MCL: maximum contaminant level. (ATSDR, 1995).
Water
The maximum contaminant level goal for benzo (a) pyrene in
drinking water is 0.2 parts per billions (ppb). In 1980, EPA developed ambient
water quality criteria to protect human health from the carcinogenic effects of
PAH exposure. The recommendation was a goal of zero (non-detectable level for
carcinogenic PAHs in ambient water). EPA, as a regulatory agency, sets a
maximum contaminant level (MCL) for benzo (a) pyrene, the most carcinogenic PAH
at 0.2ppb. EPA also sets MCLs for five other carcinogenic PAHs (see table 2)
(ATSDR, 1995).
Food
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not established standard governing the PAH content of foodstuffs but the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) have set a maximum permissible level for total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzo (a) pyrene in certain foods. Recently the maximum permissible level of health hazard dietary intake of the PAHs in cooked and processed food are not defined accurately and varies from one country to another. Janoszka et al., (2004) reported that the health hazard level of the PAHs daily ingested in diet was found to be 3.7µg/kg in Great Britain, 5.17µg/kg in Germany, 1.2 µg/kg in New Zealand and 3 µg/kg in Italy. Generally it is known that the maximum permissible level (MPLs) of total PAHs and BaP are 10 and 1µg/kg wet cooked or processed meat and fishery products respectively as reported by FAO/WHO and Stolyhow and Sikorski (2005). The above and the Health hazard level of 5.7µg/day as reported by Janoszka et al., (2004) are the accepted reference standards even in Nigeria.
1.7 Metabolism of PAHs
Once
PAHs enter the body they are metabolized in a number of organs (including
liver, kidney, lungs), excreted in bile, urine or breast milk and stored to a
limited degree in adipose tissue. The principal routes of exposure are:
inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. The lipophilicity of PAHs enables
them to readily penetrate cellular membranes (Yu, 2005). Subsequently
metabolism renders them more water-soluble making them easier for the body to
remove. However, PAHs can also be converted to more toxic or carcinogenic
metabolites.
Phase I
metabolism of PAHs
There
are three main pathways for activation of PAHs: the formation of PAH radical
cation in a metabolic oxidation process involving cytochrome P450 peroxidase,
the formation of PAH-o-quinones by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase-catalysed
oxidation and finally the creation of dihydrodiol epoxides, catalysed by
cytochome P450 (CYP) enzymes (Guengerich, 2000). The most common mechanism of
metabolic activation of PAHs, such as Benzo (a) pyrene (B(a)P), is via the
formation of bay-region dihydrodiol epoxides eg. Benzo (a)pyrene-7,
8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE), via CYP450 and epoxide hydrolase (EH) as
seen in figure 1 below.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
No Review Found.
Login To Comment