MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM COMPARISON IN TERMS OF EFFECTIVENESS AND PREFERENCES

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00001666

No of Pages: 62

No of Chapters: 5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

Abstract

This study compares the secondary school mathematics curriculum of Nigeria, United States of America (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) in terms of content, effectiveness of the curriculum, preference of the curriculum amongs the students and the effective in delivery of each of these curricula by the teachers. The study revealed there is no significant difference between the content of the curriculum of the three curricula teachers have not been effective in delivering mathematics curriculum in their schools. The study also revealed that the school environment is promoting effective acquisition of mathematics curriculum by the students. Based on the findings, the conclusions was drawn that the school environment has been promoting effective acquisition of mathematics curriculum. But the study also revealed that, quiet unfortunately, the teachers have not been effective in their primary duty of the delivery of the curriculum of this important subject to the students.  Recommendations was made based on the conclusions, there is need for training and retraining of teachers to enable them keep to date with the improvement and new development in the pedagogy so they can be more effective in curriculum delivery. There is need for incentivize the teachers to take further academic courses. This will make be better understand concepts to teach them effectively and get feedbacks from time to time from teachers regarding challenges in mathematics curriculum delivery and also ways they think these challenges could be mitigated.

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGES

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Certification                                                                                                                            ii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iii

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  iv

Table of Content                                                                                                                     v

List of Figures                                                                                                                         vi

Abstract                                                                                                                                  vii

 

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background of the Study                                                                                                            1

1.2       Statement of Problem                                                                                                 3

1.3       Objective of the study                                                                                                            4

1.4       Research Questions                                                                                                     4

1.5       Significance of the Study                                                                                           5

1.6       Operational definition of Terms                                                                                 5

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       What is Curriculum?                                                                                                   6

2.2       Nature of Curriculum                                                                                                  8

2.3       Curriculum and School Effectiveness                                                                        9

2.4       Mathematics in Education                                                                                          10

2.5       Related Researches and Findings                                                                               11

 

 

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

3.1       Introduction                                                                                                                15

3.2       Sampling Technique                                                                                                    15

3.3       Instrument for Data Collection                                                                                   15

3.4       Procedure for Administration of Data Instruments                                                    16

3.5       Data Analysis Procedure                                                                                            16

3.6       Research Hypotheses                                                                                                  16

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1       Data Summary using Frequency table and Bar Chart                                                18

4.2       Analysis using ANOVA, Cross Tabulation and Chi-Suqare                                      22

4.3       Hypotheses Testing                                                                                                     36

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Discussions                                                                                                                 38

5.2       Summary                                                                                                                     39

5.3       Conclusion                                                                                                                  39

5.4       Recommendation                                                                                                        40

 References                                                                                                                 41

Appendix                                                                                                                    43


LIST OF FIGURES

Bar Chart

 

LIST OF TABLES

Frequency tables

Table 1: Personal Information of Students                                                                 18

Table 2: Electronics/Internet Gadget                                                                          18

Table 3: Educational Plan                                                                                           19

Table 4: Planned Area of Specialization                                                                     19

Tables for Responses                                                                                                  19-37

Frequencies Tables for Teachers' responses                                                                44 - 63

Cross Tabulation                                                                                                         42 - 58

ANOVA Analysis                                                                                          45 – 59

 

 

 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Odili (2006), stated that “Mathematics is the science of numbers, quantity and space”. Mathematics as a subject is necessary for the scientific and technological development of any nation. This made it necessary for the Nigeria government to make mathematics a core subject in both primary and senior secondary school curricula (Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004). Nurudeen (2007) stated that all sciences have their roots in mathematics and described mathematics as the gate way to human endeavour. Despite the importance accorded, mathematics in Nigeria’s quest for scientific and technological development, some students still dislike, hate and fear mathematics, leading to mass failure and consistent abysmal performance in ordinary level mathematics examination over a decade now (Odili, 1986; Salau, 1995; Amazigo, 2000; Agwagah, 2001; Betiku, 2001; Obioma, 2005; Maduabum and Odili, 2006; Okereke, 2006). Ukeje (1986) observed that mathematics is one of the most poorly taught, widely hated and poorly understood subject in secondary school, students particularly girls run away from the subject. The West African Examination Council (WAEC) Chief Examiners [2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006] consistently reported candidates lack of skills in answering most of the questions asked in general mathematics.

This situation of consistently poor achievement in mathematics has been a reason for great concern for the researchers, stakeholders of mathematics education, Nigeria government and all those involved in mathematics education. A number of mathematics education researchers like Usman (2003) and Kurumeh (2006) have identified some factors responsible for this mass failure and consistent abysmal mathematics performance to include use of inappropriate and ineffective teaching approaches among others. For example, Odili (2006) outlined some of the factors responsible for poor achievement in mathematics to include i) Lack of curriculum integration. ii) Shortage of mathematics teachers. iii) Lack of instructional materials. iv) Poor government policy. v) Poor classroom organisation by teachers. vi) Lack of equipped mathematics laboratory for practical. vii) Over population of students which may impedes effective demonstration during practical. viii) Teachers impatience and un-preparedness. ix) Poor remuneration of teachers.

 

On the part of the students, hatred, phobia, dislike and discouraging perception of mathematics contributes to their poor performance in the subject. The National Council for Curriculum Assessment (NCCA, 2005) and Sidhu (2006) asserted that many students view mathematics as a difficult and an elitist subject reserved for only the best students. Musa and Agwagah (2006) asserted that performance can be better when students perceive mathematics as interesting, motivating, useful and relevant to their daily living. Ekwue and Umukoro (2011) observed that students learn, retain and understand when what they are taught (the curriculum) are linked correctly and meaningfully to their experiences and when real life examples are used.

 

Jonah, Caleb and Stephen, (2012) observed that, besides its role in national development, persons as individuals in a society, utilize the knowledge of mathematics in one form or the other. Whosoever earns and spends uses mathematics. Counting, notation, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, weighing, measuring, selling, buying and many more are simple and fundamental processes of mathematics which require immense practice. This calls for ensuring the curriculum delivered in mathematics to secondary school students is effective, relevant and interest stimulating. This leads us to the question, what is curriculum?

 

The curricula are the subjects that are included in the course of study in a school, (Okafor, 2010). Azuka (2009) posited that curriculum of a school consists of all experiences that a learner come across under the direction of school. The curriculum of any educational system is planned and developed according to the needs of the society. The author stated further that, just as the society is dynamic, the curriculum is also dynamic. Hence, curriculum is usually revised from time to time. The importance of Curriculum in the education system cannot be overemphasized. As rightly referred to by Alade (2005) in Azuka, B. F: Jekayinfa, O; Durojaiye, D & Okwuoza, S. O (2013); the curriculum is an important instrument in educational system. As education is central to the society, so is curriculum which is the heart and life-wire of education. When effective curriculum is delivered, students are absorbed by its contents and are challenged as well as intrigued to make every effort to acquire as much content of it as possible. When mathematics curriculum is well acquired by secondary students, the foundation for achieving career in science and technology is well laid.

 

As argued earlier, many mathematics education researchers have associated with learning and performance in mathematics by secondary school students in Nigeria to mostly teacher related problems. But could it be more of curriculum problem? As Etuk and Bello (n.d.) asserted, is Nigerian mathematics curriculum is to deliver on its aim of given students the desired skills and experiences at secondary school? Perhaps, one can ask, could the curriculum of mathematics in secondary school in Nigeria ineffective? Where does it stand compared with mathematics curriculum of American secondary schools and Britains secondary school in Nigeria? Do students prefer the mathematics curricular of American secondary schools and Britains secondary school in Nigeria than that of Nigeria? Why? This research aims at revealing all that.

 

1.2 Statement of Problem

Year after year secondary school students perform poorly in mathematics in external examinations administered by the West African Examination Council, (WAEC), National Examination Council, (NECO), Joint Admission and Matriculation Board, (JAMB), etc. Because some students have strong hatred and phobia for mathematics, they perform poorly in it (WAEC, 2007). Such students perceive mathematics as difficult, abstract, unattractive, boring, not captivating and not motivating and not related to their daily living. As a result, they make little or no effort to study and learn mathematics. They may not have been exposed to the relevance of mathematics to their lives. They cannot relate what they learnt in the classroom to what happens in their environment. (Kurumeh, Omenka and Mohammed, 2013). This study wants to focus on the effectiveness of mathematics curriculum and its preference amongst the students of secondary schools in Nigeria. We believe that an effective curriculum will have large effect on students acquisition of the curriculum and make them prefer it. These will consequently affect their performance in mathematics.

 

1.3 Objective of the Study

The Objective of the study is to determine which of the secondary school mathematics curriculum of (Nigeria, United States of America and the United Kingdom) is not effective and the most preferred amongst secondary school students in Nigeria. If teachers are effective in the delivery of mathematics curriculum and the effect of the schools environment on students ability to learn mathematics.

 

1.4 Research Questions

The following research question will be used for the study.

i.           Have the teachers been effective in delivering mathematics curriculum in their schools?

ii.         Is the school environment promoting effective acquisition of mathematics curriculum by the students?

iii.       Which of the secondary school mathematics curriculum of Nigeria, United States of America and the United Kingdom is more effective in terms of content?

 

1.5 Significance of the Study

The findings of this study will be beneficial to the students, teachers, curriculum planners, the government and Nigeria as a nation. The will benefit from the developing a good attitude towards mathematics. The teachers will benefit through adopting a better approach to teaching mathematics. Curriculum planners will understand the impact different curricula have on the academic achievements of learners in mathematics. The government will understand where Nigerian secondary school mathematics curriculum stands in comparison to that of that of US and UK in terms of effectiveness and preferences by students.

 

1.6 Operational Definition of Terms

Mathematics

The study of the relationship among numbers, shapes, and quantities. It uses signs, symbols, and proofs and includes arithmetic, algebra, calculus, geometry, and trigonometry.

Curriculum

Curriculum is a course of study. It is a description of what, why, how and when students learn. What students are expected to know, understand, and be able to do in each subject.

Secondary School.

The school intermediate between primary school and tertiary institutions of learning offering general, technical, vocational, or university-preparatory courses.

Data

Factual information (such as measurements or statics) used as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or calculation.  


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment